IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 COCP-3217-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2026 Sultan Singh ...Petitioner Versus Pankaj Yadav and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 05.04.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by this Court in CWP-119-1998. 2. On an advance copy having been furnished, Mr. Praveen Kumar, DAG, Haryana, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents and states that the respondent-State has preferred an intra court appeal against the judgment and order dated 05.04.2025 (Annexure P-1 and P-2) and the Letters Patent Bench has been pleased to stay the operation of the aforesaid judgment. He has produced a copy of the order dated 14.11.2025 passed in LPA-3216-2025 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others vs. Dharam Pal and another’ and order dated 26.02.2026 passed in LPA-459-2026 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others vs. Sultan Singh’. The same are taken on record. A copy thereof stands furnished to SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-3217-2026 (O&M) -2- learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition, at this stage, with liberty to seek revival upon the decision of the aforesaid appeals, if required. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS SURI) July 27, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment