IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.776 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2023 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== BINDU DEVI W/O CHANDAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE- RITH KE TOLA, P.S- EKMA, DISTT.- SARAN (CHAPRA). ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MAMTA KUMARI D/O LATE LALAN SAH R/O VILLAGE- RITH KE TOLA, P.S- EKMA, DISTT.- SARAN (CHAPRA). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Usha Kumari 1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 29-01-2026 Despite valid service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the respondent no. 2. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P. for of the State. 3. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 14.12.2023 passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Saran at Chapra in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 50 of 2023, registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the IPC and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short “SC/ST Act”), whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.776 of 2024(4) dt.29-01-2026 2/3 appellant has been rejected. 4. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this appellant along with other accused persons committed mar-pit with the informant and abused taking caste name. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the appellant. No specific allegation of overt act has been attributed to the appellant. From perusal of F.I.R., it is apparent that there is no allegation of abuse taking caste name, hence, no case of SC/ST Act is made out against the appellant. Appellant is only alleged to be order giver and is also alleged to have snatched silver jewellery from the informant which is superficial in nature. Doctor has found injuries to be simple in nature. Appellant claims clean antecedent. 6. Learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the appeal of the appellant. 7. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and clean antecedent, the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 is, hereby, set aside and this criminal appeal is allowed. 8. Let the appellant, as named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.776 of 2024(4) dt.29-01-2026 3/3 learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 50 of 2023. khushbu/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T