Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3415 (UTT)

SMT. ANITA JAISWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3186/2018 · 2026-04-16

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2680 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3186/2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mohd. Sohail, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.04.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a1 31bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56 D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.04.17 09:53:13 +05'30'