Ct. No.4 D/L 19.08.2026 (Naba) 08 M.A.T. 118 of 2025 With CAN 1 of 2025 CAN 2 of 2025 Sri Ramen Chandra Das Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta, ld. A.G.P., Ms. Tanusree Ghosh ...for the State Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Mr. Nilay Baran Mondal ...for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 1. On 01.07.2026, the Court in the present proceeding took notice of submission made by the learned advocate for the respondents that the appellant was pursuing parallel remedies in respect of the same cause of action. The Court further took notice of an averment made in the writ petition on affidavit that the petitioner has no other alternative, legal efficacious and speedy remedy than to move a writ petition. 2. When the learned advocate for the appellant was confronted with such observations, he sought an adjournment for availing instructions from his client in this regard. 3. When the matter was taken up thereafter on 08.07.2026, again a prayer was made for adjournment. 2 4. The case was accordingly adjourned, and is taken up today, when there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 5. Since none appears on behalf of the appellant, and no prayer for accommodation is made, without going into merits of the observations recorded in the earlier order/s, the appeal is dismissed for default. 6. Pending applications also stand disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Partha Pratim Roy, J.)