IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9778 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2014 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Harihar Sahani Son of Late Hawaldar Sahani Resident of Village- Marwa Basahiya, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 13-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.415 of 2024, arising out of Panapur P.S. Case no.110 of 2014 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 436, 387, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, section 27 of the Arms Act, sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act and sections 17 and 18 of the C.L.A. Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, demand of Rs.1.5 lacs was made by the accused persons who are said to be maoists and on the same not being met, it is stated that the accused persons put the JCB on fire and destroyed the chimney by carrying out bomb blasts. They were raising slogans in support of the organisation. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9778 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 25.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. no.68345 of 2024 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months. It has been more than 1 year 2 months since the said order. The petitioner has remained in custody since 30.1.2024 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the liberty granted in the earlier order of rejection dated 25.11.2024 and the petitioner having remained in custody for over 2 years since 30.1.2024, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.415 of 2024, arising out of Panapur P.S. Case no.110 of 2014 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge XI, Chapra at Saran. Saurabh/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T