Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3413 (RAJ)

SHRAWAN KUMAR JAIMAN S/O LATE SHRI K. K. JAIMAN, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/22/2026 · 2026-02-24

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 22/2026 In S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1519/2025 1. Shrawan Kumar Jaiman S/o Late Shri K. K. Jaiman, Aged About 72 Years, R/o House No. C-515, Siddharth Nagar, Jawahar Circle, Jaipur, (Raj.). 2. Mithlesh Jaiman W/o Shri Shrawan Kumar Jaiman, Aged About 68 Years, R/o House No. C-515, Siddharth Nagar, Jawahar Circle, Jaipur, (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General of Police, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Superintendent of Police, Jaipur East. 4. S.H.O Police Station Airport Thana, Sanganer, Jaipur. 5. Smt. Shakshi Jaiman D/o Shri Maman Chand Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o House No. 101/5, Shyam Vihar, Gole Pulli, Talab Tillo, Jammu. 6. Shri Maman Chand Sharma S/o Late Shri Unknown, Aged About 69 Years, R/o House No. 101/5, Shyam Vihar, Gole Pulli, Talab Tillo, Jammu. 7. Smt. Urmila Sharma W/o Shri Maman Chand Sharma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o House No. 101/5, Shyam Vihar, Gole Pulli, Talab Tillo, Jammu. 8. Shri Hemant Sharma S/o Shri Maman Chand Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o House No. 101/5, Shyam Vihar, Gole Pulli, Talab Tillo, Jammu. 9. Shri Aashish Sharma S/o Shri Maman Chand Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 101/5, Shyam Vihar, Gole Pulli, Talab Tillo, Jammu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Mewara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore-PP (2 of 4) [CRLMA-22/2026] Mr. Roop Narayan Yadav- SHO- Airport Thana JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/02/2026 1. Matter comes upon misc. application submitted by the applicants-petitioners seeking compliance of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by this Court. 2. Counsel for the applicants-petitioners submits that while passing the aforesaid order, a clear and specific direction was issued to the Nodal Officer i.e. SHO Airport Thana, Sanganer, Jaipur to ensure compliance of the order dated 10.10.2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Jaipur-II (Sanganer) and the respondent Nos. 5 to 9 were directed not to cause any hindrance in the living of the petitioners in the subject house. Counsel submits that inspite of the clear and specific directions issued by this Court, till date, the Nodal Officer has not complied with the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by this Court, hence, under these circumstances, appropriate orders be issued for implementation of the same. 3. This Court vide order dated 20.01.2026 directed the learned Public Prosecutor to instruct the concerned SHO, Airport Thana Sanganer, Jaipur to remain present before this Court. 4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the SHO, Airport Thana Sanganer, Jaipur has appeared before this Court on last date i.e. 13.02.2026 and this Court directed him to file reply to the instant application. (3 of 4) [CRLMA-22/2026] 5. In pursuance of the said order, a reply has been submitted mentioning incorrect facts. This Court is not satisfied with the aforesaid reply submitted by the SHO, Airport Thana, Sanganer, Jaipur. The Station House Officer has made a statement before this Court that the petitioners have put a lock on the main gate due to which their daughter-in-law is not in a position to get her articles that are lying at the first floor of the house. He submits that the only grievance of the daughter-in-law is to get her articles back, so under these circumstances, appropriate orders be passed. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances as narrated by the counsel for the petitioners and the SHO, Airport Thana, Sanganer, Jaipur, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the SHO, Airport Thana, Sanganer, Jaipur to instruct the petitioners as well as the daughter-in-law i.e. respondent No. 5 to appear at the subject house on 09.03.2026. The SHO is further directed to instruct the petitioners as well as the respondent No. 5 to appear in person at the subject house and in his presence the lock on the main gate of the house shall be opened and thereafter, the articles of the respondent No. 5 lying at the subject house shall be handed over to her. The SHO Airport Thana, Sanganer, Jaipur is further directed to ensure that no controversial incident occurs on that day and thereafter ensure that adequate protection be provided to the petitioners in the future in compliance of the order dated 10.10.2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Jaipur-II (Sanganer). (4 of 4) [CRLMA-22/2026] 7. With the aforesaid direction, the present misc. application stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/103