Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3413 (GAU)

AFTAB HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/413/2026 · 2026-03-24

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010039012026 2026:GAU-AS:4496 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/413/2026 AFTAB HUSSAIN S/O- ABUL HUSSAIN R/O- VILL- HIRAPARA, P.O. P.S.-DHULA DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M AHMED, MR A. ALI,N. CHOUDHURY,A. K. KANU Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 25.03.2026 Heard Mr M Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. Perused the Case Diary. Page No.# 2/2 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was at Mangaldoi on the date of occurrence. However, there is nothing on record to show such absence from the place of occurrence. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the Scorpio vehicle mentioned in the FIR. 4. The allegations levelled in the FIR and the contents of the Case Diary do not inspire this Court to grant the privilege of an anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage of investigation. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected at this stage. JUDGE Comparing Assistant