Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34118 (CAL)

PARUL RANI SEN AND ANR v. NIRMAL DEY AND ORS

CO/2530/2026 · 2026-08-07

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item- 15. sg 07-08-2026 Ct. 6 CO 2549 of 2026 Parul Rani Sen & Anr. Versus Nirmal Dey & Ors. Mr. D.K. Adhikari Mr. S.K. Adhikari Mr. Debdip Adhikari …for the petitioners The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that through inadvertence, the instant civil revisional application has been filed though the order impugned is an appealable one. He prays for leave to withdraw the instant civil revisional application with liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioners, this civil revisional application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. The learned advocate-on-record for the petitioner shall be permitted to take back the certified copy of this order impugned by replacing the same with a Photostat copy thereof. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)