Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010264192026 NC: 2026:KHC:42177 WP No. 13201 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 13201 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. AMTHUR RAHAMAN SUMAIA W/O LATE MOHAMMAD SAMIULLA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
2.
SRI SAUD MALIK S/O LATE MOHAMMAD SAMIULLA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
3.
SRI SAFI MALIK S/O LATE MOHAMMAD SAMIULLA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
4.
UMME SADAF D/O LATE MOHAMMAD SAMIULLA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
(ALL ARE THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED DEFENDANT SRI MOHAMMED SAMIULLA)
ALL ARE RESIDING AT WARD NO.1 VENKATAGIRIKOTE CHINTAMANI TOWN CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI AMRUTH CHOWDHARY S., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010264192026 NC: 2026:KHC:42177 WP No. 13201 of 2026
AND:
1. PAYAJUNNISHA W/O LATE ABDUL WAHEED AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/O VENKATAGIRIKOTE CHINTAMANI TOWN-563125.
2.
MOHASEEN TAJ D/O LATE ABDUL WAHEED W/O CHAND PASHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/O WARD NO.17 CHIKKABALLAPUR TOWN.
3.
NOOR ASMA D/O LATE ABDUL WAHEED W/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O NO.644, WARD NO.17 FORT, CHIKKABALLAPUR TOWN.
4. WAHEEDA D/O LATE ABDUL WAHEED W/O SYED ZAMEER AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O UPPARAPETE CHINTAMANI TALUK.
5.
FARIDA BHANU D/O LATE ABDUL WAHEED W/O RIZWAN AHMED AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O GULZAR MOHALLA WARD NO.22 CHINTAMANI TOWN.
6. TABASSUM D/O LATE ABDUL WAHEED W/O FAROOQ KHAN
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010264192026 NC: 2026:KHC:42177 WP No. 13201 of 2026
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/O VENKATAGIRIKOTE CHINTAMANI TOWN.
(ALL ARE THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED PLAINTIFF SRI ABDUL WAHEED) …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 08.01.2026 PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHINTAMANI CHIKKABALLAPURA ON I.A.NO.5 IN O.S.NO.363/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-F.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 08.01.2026 passed by the Prl.Civil Judge and JMFC, Chintamani, Chikkaballapur, on IA.No.5 in O.S No.363/2019.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners/defendants submits that the respondents/plaintiffs have earlier filed a suit in O.S.No.245/2017 for declaration and injunction and an award was passed on 13.07.2019. Thereafter, the present suit filed in the year 2019. On 02.11.2022, the petitioners filed their
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010264192026 NC: 2026:KHC:42177 WP No. 13201 of 2026
written statement raising the issue of res judicata and limitation. On 05.09.2023, the respondents have filed an application under
Order VI Rule 17 of CPC seeking the amendment of the plaint. The trial Court allowed the same by the impugned order.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in the light of earlier settlement, the present suit is not maintainable. Hence, the trial Court ought not to have allowed the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC and hence, the impugned order has to be set aside.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record.
5. If the suit is not maintainable, that is not the ground for the Court to allow the application that is filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC. The petitioners have to come up before the Court with appropriate application. The grounds that are raised are not the grounds for the Court to dismiss the application. Except this ground, no other grounds are stated in the petition.
6. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following:
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010264192026 NC: 2026:KHC:42177 WP No. 13201 of 2026
ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. ii. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4