- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010202002023 NC: 2026:KHC:44234 WP No. 8836 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 8836 OF 2023 (L-PF) BETWEEN: DODDABALLAPUR SPINNING MILLS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING OFFICE AT NO 14, 8TH B MAIN ROAD, RMV EXTENSION, SADASHIVNAGAR, BANGALORE 560080, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR ABHISHEK ANAND …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VAMSHI KRISHNA C.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER - II HAVING REGIONAL OFFICE AT NO 2, MAARUTI COMPLEX, 1ST A MAIN ROAD, HIG 'A' SECTOR, NEAR SBI, YELEHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU 560064 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. M.R. SHALAMALA.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010202002023 NC: 2026:KHC:44234 WP No. 8836 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Smt.M.R.Shalamala., counsel for the respondent appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 04.08.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner it was ordered to be listed on 18.08.2026. The petition is listed today. A perusal of the petition papers would reflect that the petition is filed in 2023. Now we are in August, 2026. The petition is pending for three years. As - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010202002023 NC: 2026:KHC:44234 WP No. 8836 of 2023 already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35