Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3411 (PNJ)

DAVINDER SINGH @ BHINDER AND ORS. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CRM-M/13015/2026 · 2026-04-30

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-13015-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.284 CRM-M-13015-2026 Decided on : 30.04.2026 Davinder Singh @ Bhinder and others ...... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM :      *** Present : Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Gulzar Mohammad, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. ***     , J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of FIR No.61 dated 23.04.2015, registered under Sections 323, 324, 325, 308, 341, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Sadar, Khanna, Police Distt. Khanna (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. Vide order dated 07.04.2026, passed by this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its re- port qua the genuineness of the compromise. MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.01 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-13015-2026 2 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ludhiana and got their statements re- corded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ludhiana has submitted report dated 24.04.2026 to the ef- fect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to con- tinue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Su- preme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.61 dated 23.04.2015, re- gistered under Sections 323, 324, 325, 308, 341, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Sta- tion Sadar, Khanna, Police Distt. Khanna (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) are quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly.           Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No       MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.01 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-13015-2026 3 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.01 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh