... Appellants Versus ... Respondents Present : Mr. Anil Ghangas, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate for Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3. (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’) referred to as the ‘deceased’) in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on JITENDER KUMAR 2026.01.16 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh by the Tribunal is not consonance with the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme however, a multiplier of ‘13’ was applied instead of ‘15’. the head ‘loss of consortium’. the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of JITENDER KUMAR 2026.01.16 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Hon’ble Hon’ble Supreme Court in prospects. The Tribunal has incorrectly applied a multiplier of ‘13’ which as JITENDER KUMAR 2026.01.16 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh , ought to have been ‘15’. the conventional heads as well as under the head ‘loss of consortium’. Hence, JITENDER KUMAR 2026.01.16 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh In view of the decision by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in JITENDER KUMAR 2026.01.16 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh