Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3410 (JHR)

SUNIL GANJHU @ SOMA GANJHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1231/2026 · 2026-04-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10235 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 1231 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1231 of 2026 1. Sunil Ganjhu @ Soma Ganjhu, aged about 29 years, son of Balgovind Ganjhu 2. Amerika Ganjhu, aged about 52 years, son of Magan Ganjhu 3. Vikash Ganjhu, aged about 31 years, son of Late Tabul Ganjhu 4. Rohit Ganjhu, aged about 30 years, son of late Mohar Ganjhu 5. Mintu Ganjhu @ Rajendra Ganjhu, aged about 30 years, son of Ram Ganjhu @ Ramu Ganjhu 6. Amresh Ganjhu, aged about 19 years, son of Dileshwar Ganjhu 7. Suraj Ganjhu, aged about 30 years, son of Sukra Ganjhu 8. Mukesh Ganjhu, aged about 36 years, son of Budhan Ganjhu, all resident of Village- Bulhu, P.O. & P.S. Chandwa, District- Latehar … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 02/09.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.246/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115, 117, 109, 3(5) of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned A.C.J.M., Latehar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that the altercation took place as the informant has dashed the animal of petitioner no.8. He then submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners. He next submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 13 of this application. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations of assault are there. ( 2026:JHHC:10235 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 1231 of 2026 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations of assault against the petitioners. The injury has been received, but it is not clear on whose blow such injury has been received. The petitioners are having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 13 of this application. 6. In that view of the matter, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. 7. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 9th April, 2026 Ajay/