MUKESHKUMAR ARVINDBHAI THAKKAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT
CR.MA/20701/2026 · 2026-09-03
M R Mengdey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3410 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3410 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
R/CR.MA/20701/2026(GJHC240666622026) ORDER DATED: 03/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 20701 of 2026 ========================================================== MUKESHKUMAR ARVINDBHAI THAKKAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR SMIT P VAGHELA(10653) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Date : 03/09/2026
ORDER Draft amendment is granted. The same to be carried out forthwith.
1. Present Petition is preferred by the Petitioner (Original Accused) under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing and setting aside of impugned order dated 22.8.2023 passed in Criminal Case No.117 of 2019 by learned Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C at Paddhari, Rajkot for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned APP for the Respondent – State. Learned Advocate Mr.M.M.Kadiwala appears and states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No.2 – Original Complainant and he would be filing his appearance during the course of the day. Registry to accept the Vakalatnama.
3. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondent – State and learned Advocate Mr.M.M.Kadiwala waives service of Rule on behalf of the Original Complainant.
R/CR.MA/20701/2026(GJHC240666622026) ORDER DATED: 03/09/2026
4. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they are now not willing to proceed with the complaint any further.
5. Leaned Advocate appearing on behalf Original Complainant, has placed on record the Affidavit dated 26.8.2026. He submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and there is no objection if present Petition is allowed.
6. The complainant, Kishanbhai S/o Vashrambhai Chandrala (Chandvola) is present before the court who has been identified by learned advocate for the complainant and he has also filed an affidavit on record of the present petition indicating the settlement arrived at between the parties.
7. Considering averments made in the Affidavit as also the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties, the present Application deserves to be allowed and is hereby allowed. The impugned order dated 22.8.2023 passed in Criminal Case No.117 of 2019 by learned Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C at Paddhari, Rajkot is hereby quashed and set aside qua the present Petitioner. Rule is made absolute. If the applicant is in custody, he shall be released forthwith.
(M. R. MENGDEY,J) Manshi Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: AMIN MANSI(HC01561), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/09/2026 18:10:08