Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 341 (GAU)

RAKESH KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Crl.Pet./879/2025 · 2026-03-25

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010157082025 2026:GAU-AS:4498 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./879/2025 RAKESH KUMAR DAS S/O- SRI SURENDRA NATH DAS. R/O- H.NO.22, WARD NO.56, PATORKUCHI ROAD, BASISTHA CHARIALI, P.O. AND P.S.- BASISTHA, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BISWAS, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 26.03.2026 Heard Mr S Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr R J Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/2 2. Mr S Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that when the entire proceeding have been closed on submission of a Final Report, the petitioner had approached this Court challenging the order of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (Metro), in connection with Dispur PS Case No. 4048/2021. 3. Mr Biswas has submitted that on a petition being filed before the learned Trial Court, raising grievances against accepting the Final Report, the learned Trial Court has, by the order dated 13.03.2026, passed in Dispur PS Case No. 4048/2021, rejected the Final Report and has remitted the matter back for further investigation by an Officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, who would conduct an independent, objective and time-bound investigation addressing the specific queries noted in the order itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the time being, the grievances of the petitioner stand redressed and this Criminal Petition would not require any further adjudication for the moment. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition stands closed. 6. The petitioner would be at liberty to raise any future grievances, without reference to the closure of this criminal petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant