IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CR-4879-2026 (O&M) Decided on:28.07.2026 SARAVJEET KAUR ...PETITIONER VERSUS S.K. SANSAL AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Ms. Priya, Advocate for petitioner. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present civil revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioner for quashing of impugned order dated 06.05.2026 (Annexure P1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panchkula in Civil Suit No.812 of 2024 titled as S.K. Sansal Vs. General Public, whereby matter was adjourned for consideration of applications for impleadment of petitioner as defendant in the abovesaid suit and for striking out general public from the array of parties. 2. It is the case of petitioner that she had already endorsed ‘no objection’ on the said applications and therefore, learned Court ought to have decided the application keeping in view ‘no objection’ endorsed by petitioner, however same was wrongly adjourned for consideration. Thereafter, a subsequent application for correction of order dated 25.03.2026 (Annexure P/4) under Section 152 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was preferred, however, the case was adjourned to 06.05.2026 for consideration on said application also. 3. It is the case of petitioner that parties have already SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.28 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-4879-2026 (O&M) -2- compromised the matter vide compromise deed (Ex.C/1) and this fact is duly recorded in order dated 25.03.2026 passed by learned Court of First Instance. It is submitted that learned Court of First Instance ought to have taken all the facts noted above into consideration and should have passed appropriate order by allowing the application preferred by petitioner. 4. In view of nature of controversy, no interference is required by this Court. However, petitioner is relegated to approach learned Court of First Instance and seek relief sought in present revision petition in accordance with law and in case any such application is preferred, the Court shall decide the same within two months in accordance with law. 5. Present petition is allowed in above terms. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 28.07.2026 Sunil Chander Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.28 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document