IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.10035 of 2026 Sarat Kumar Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. S. Behera, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 08.04.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the circumstances, it is humbly therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs by directing the opp. party No.1 to extend the benefits of 2nd RACP w.e.f. 08.08.2013 instead of 01.01.2016 promotional benefits of ACF, one notional increment w.e.f. 01.03.2025 and promotional benefits of DFO as mentioned in para-11 of the writ petition forthwith; Or pass any other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court may think deem fit and proper; And allow this writ application.”. 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting her grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any p. 2 p. 2 opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat