Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3408 (BOM)

SURAJ PRADEEPLAL AGNIHOTRI v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRINCIPAL SEC. URBAN DEV. DEPT. MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS.

WP/6050/2026 · 2026-08-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 127.wp6050.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6050 OF 2026 SURAJ PRADEEPLAL AGNIHOTRI VS STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRINCIPAL SEC. URBAN DEV. DEPT. MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Vijay R. Mishra, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. T.H. Khan, AGP for respondent No.1/State. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATE : 17.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present petition prays for direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation dated 07.04.2026 and enforce the notice dated 29.04.2026 issued under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act. 3. At the stage, it is necessary to mention here that though the petitioner has prayed for removal of the illegal construction, in order to test the bonafide of the petitioner, it would be necessary to assess whether the construction of the petitioner is also legal or not. Prity 2 / 2 127.wp6050.2026 4. In that view of the order, following order is passed : 5. Notice issued on 29.04.2026 by the Chief Officer, Nagar Parishad, Wardha, be taken to logical end in accordance with law and after following principles of natural justice i.e. after hearing the affected parties. 6. The respondent/Chief Officer, Nagar Parishad, Wardha, is directed to inspect the construction of the petitioner’s house also and take appropriate proceedings, if necessary, in the light of the provisions of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act. 7. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajnish R. Vyas, J.) (Anil S. Kilor, J.) Prity Signed by: Mrs. Prity Gabhane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/08/2026 17:24:25