[2026:RJ-JP:16649] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 226/2026 1. Priyanka D/o Shri Rakesh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Sitaheda, Sitahar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Pin- 321605. 2. Dhara Singh Gurjar S/o Samaliya Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Gurjaron Ki Jhopadi, Idgah Ke Paas, Jaipur Marg, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan . Pin 322201. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarters, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 4. S.h.o. Police Station Udei Mod, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 5. Mohan Sharma S/o Shri Rakesh, Resident Of Sitaheda, Sitahar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Pin- 321605. 6. Dinesh Sharma S/o Shri Rakesh, Resident Of Sitaheda, Sitahar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Pin- 321605. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 20/04/2026 dk;kZy; }kjk bafxr vk{ksi oso fd;s tkrs gSaA ;kph i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dks lquk x;k ,oa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA [2026:RJ-JP:16649] (2 of 3) [CRLW-226/2026] orZeku fjV ;kfpdk ;kphx.k }kjk vius thou o O;fDrxr Lora=rk dh lqj{kk miyC/k djk;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gqvk gS fd ;kph Øe&01 igys ls gh fookfgr gS rFkk fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj fookg foPNsn ugha gqvkA igys ls gh fookfgr ,sls O;fDr vius thou lkFkh ls fHkUu O;fDr ds lkFk fyo&bu fjys'ku vFkok oSokfgd laca/k cuk ldrs gSa vFkok ugha rFkk ,sls laca/kksa ds vk/kkj ij okafNr lqj{kk miyC/k djk;h tk ldrh gS vFkok ugha] ;g fcUnq bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB ds le{k Rashika Khandal & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., 2021 SCC Online Raj. 4296 esa fopkj dk fo"k; jgk] ftlesa led{k ihB }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; D. Velusamy Vs. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10 SCC 469 dk vuqlj.k djrs gq, o izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds izdk'k esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh gS fd igys ls gh fookfgr O;fDr vius thou lkFkh ls fHkUu O;fDr ds lkFk bl izdkj dk laca/k j[kus gsrq fof/kr% vuqer ugha gS vkSj ,sls O;fDr;ksa dks lqj{kk miyC/k djk;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA U;kf;d fu.kZ; Rashika Khandal & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. ¼iwoksZDr½ ds iSjk la[;k 2] 3 o 4 lqlaxr gS] tks fuEukuqlkj gSa%& “2. From perusal of the record, it is revealed that Petitioner No.2 is already married. A live-in-relationship between a married and unmarried person is not permissible. 3. The pre-requities for a live-in-relationship as held by the Apex Court in “D.Velusamy vs. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10 SCC 469” is that the couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses and must be of legal age to marry or qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being unmarried. 4. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly dismissed.” [2026:RJ-JP:16649] (3 of 3) [CRLW-226/2026] ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; rFkk jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds mijksDr fu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk dks ns[krs gq, ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA ifj.kker% ;g fjV ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk LFkxu vkosnu Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /115