2026:JHHC:9145 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4750 of 2018 …… Kamta Prasad Singh, aged about 51 years, s/o Sadhu Charan Singh, resident of P.T.P.S., P.O. & P.S. Patratu, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand. …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 4. The Officer in Charge, Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Ramgarh Cantt., P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 6. Babita Devi, w/o Manoj Prasad Mehta @ Manoj Kumar Mehta, resident of Jara Tola, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh Cantt., District-Ramgarh. …..Respondent (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Srivastava, Adv For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Apoorva Singh, A.C. to S.C. (Mines)-II …… 12/01.04.2026 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs;. That the instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondents especially respondent no. 5 to give possession of the shop no. D/24 situated at New Bus Stand, Ramgarh belonging to the petitioner which has been forcefully and illegally auctioned by the respondent no. 5 in gross violation of the legal and valid claim of the petitioner and also ignoring the application/complain made by the petitioner on 01.12.2014 to take action against Manoj Prasad Mehta @ Manoj Kumar Mehta and order of 144 Cr. P.C. vide order dtd 02.02.2015 passed by respondent no. 3 (S.D.O., Ramgarh) And 2026:JHHC:9145 2 Further for a direction upon the respondent no. 5 to pay the demurrage to the petitioner whose shop no D/24 allotted by the respondent no. 5 himself, has been forcefully & illegally auctioned by respondent no.5 on false & frivolous charge And/or To pass any such order to which your Lordships may deem fit & proper in the interest of justice 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the 5th respondent and a direction may be issued to him to decide the representation. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that, since no counter-affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner may be directed to approach the 5th respondent. 4. Having regard to the limited submission by learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the 5th respondent. If any such representation is preferred before the 5th respondent, the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law and the applicable rules and regulations within a period of 12 weeks. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of. Pending I.As if any also stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J) 01.04.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 06.04.2026