Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34067 (KAR)

SRIDHARA M v. RAMAKRISHNA P

MFA/5746/2019 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T. AND SRI NAMAN VANKDARI M., MEMBER MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5746 OF 2019 (MV-I) (LOK-ADALAT NO.2243 OF 2026) BETWEEN: SRIDHARA M S/O MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.35 6TH CROSS 3RD MAIN SBM LAYOUT SIDDARAMESHWARA LAYOUT EAST BATAWADI TUMAKURU -572101 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI SHANTHARAJ K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAMAKRISHNA P AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.230/19-2 3RD FLOOR 3RD CROSS VENKATAPURA BENGALURU -560 034 2. MOHAMMAD SHAZAD S/O JAILABUDDIN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT G.A.PALYA D.S.PALYA POST HEBBUR HOBLI TUMAKURU TALUK-572101 3. ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INSURANCE BY ITS MANAGER ICICI LOMBARD HOUSE 414 VEER SAVARKAR MARG NEAR SRI SIDDIVINAYAKA TEMPLE PRABHADEVI MUMBAI-400 025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R3, NOTICE TO R1 & 2 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 30.03.2023) Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.12.2018 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.1105 OF 2017 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND MACT AT TUMAKURU ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its Authorised Officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,30,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Thirty thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks' from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 3 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant-claimant, on proper identification. 5. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed off in terms of the joint memo. The judgment and award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER mn/-