Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34063 (CHH)

VIJAY TOPPO v. UNION OF INDIA

WPS/5221/2026 · 2026-08-31

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010243342026 2026:CGHC:38737 NA FR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5221 of 2026 1 - Vijay Toppo S/o Budharam Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Chadragarh Post Parsagudi Tehsil Rajpur District- Balrampur- Chhattisgarh Pin Code - 497118 (Roll No. 6204019115) 2 - Nitesh Painkra S/o Matthu Say Painkra Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Lawakera Tehsil Pharsabahar District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh Pin Code 496245 (Roll No. 6204040169 ) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi. 2 - Staff Selection Commission, Through Its Chairman/ Director Block No. 12, C G O Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi P I N- 110003 3 - Director, General C R P F (Recruitment Branch) East Block - 07 Lavel- 04 Sector 01, R.K. Ruram New Delhi (Through Its Director General) 4 - Director General, C I S F (H Q) C G O Complex, Block - 13, Lodhi Road, New Delhi (110003) 5 - Directorate General Of Assam Rifles ( H Q D G A R) Laitkor, Shillong Meghalaya (793010) 6 - Regional Director (M P R) Staff Selection Commission, 5th Floor, Investment Building L I C Campus - 2 Pandri Raipur (C.G.) P I N 492004 ... Respondents ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.09.02 17:43:17 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Yashwant Mishra, Advocate For UOI/Respondent : Mr. Rishabh Deo Singh, CGC (Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru) Order on Board 01/09/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for records pertaining to CFSL/NCRB report/domicile verification report of the petitioners to the Respondent Authority specifically Respondent No. 2 & 3, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction directing the respondents to complete the dossier/domicile verification of the petitioners within a stipulated time period. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to further direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment, if found suitable, without insisting upon again medical examination. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Grant any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3 10.5 That any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have submitted application forms pursuant to the advertisement issued for NCB Examination, 2025 for the post of Constable GD in CAPFs, SSF and Rifleman in Assam Rifles. After submission of the application forms petitioners have cleared written examination, physical efficiency test and medical examination and were declared successful. Final result of which was declared on 15.01.2026. Name of the petitioners have been shown in the withheld list whereas, petitioners have been successfully qualified all the tests. It is contention of counsel for the petitioners that petitioners being placed in the withheld list, Dossier/Domicile Verification is still pending and therefore, direction be issued to the respondents to complete the said proceedings, at the earliest. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the verification of the identification/genuineness of the withheld candidates is under process and the same shall be completed in accordance with the prescribed procedure. 4. On due consideration of submission of counsel for the parties, nature of grievance raised, and further considering that the proceedings pertaining to verification of the petitioners are still pending consideration, the writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the respondents authorities to conclude the process of identification/genuineness of the petitioners 4 and complete Dossier/Domicile verification, in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the Order. It is for the counsel for the respondents to intimate the respondent authorities about the order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE ashu