- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010544552025 NC: 2026:KHC:44191 WP No. 25122 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 25122 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.SAVITHRAMMA W/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI CHANNARAJU, S/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 3. SRI MUNILAKSHMAPPA, S/O LATE BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 4. SMT.MUNINANJAMMA, D/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGAE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110 BENGALURU RURAL DSITRICT (PETITIONER NO.1 NOT CLAIMING SENIOR CITIZENSHIP SCHEME / BENEFITS) …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N S BHAT.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION, AT DODDABALLAPUR - 561 203 Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010544552025 NC: 2026:KHC:44191 WP No. 25122 of 2025 2. THE TAHSILDAR, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, DODDABALLAPUR - 561 203 3. SRI D.S.SIDDANNA, S/O LATE D.S. SOMASHEKARAIAH, R/AT NO.2000/2, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, MCC A BLOCK, DAVANAGERE - 577 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N.,HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. K RAGHAVENDRA RAO.,ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING AN ORDER DATED- 28-07-2025 IN VACATING INTERIM ORDER IN CASE NO. RA(DO) 199/2025 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR - RESPONDENT NO.1 AS PER ANNEXURE-N AND CONSEQUENTLY TO STAY THE EXECUTION AND OPERATION OF ORDER DATED 21-04-2025 IN RRT(DIS) 108/2025 OR TO CONTINUE STATUS QUO ORDER TILL THE DISPOSAL OF CASE NO.RA (DO)- 199/2025 BEFORE THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010544552025 NC: 2026:KHC:44191 WP No. 25122 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the interim order dated 28.07.2025 passed by respondent No.1 in RA (DO):No.199/2025. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the writ petition is arising out of the interim order passed by respondent No.1, I am of the considered view that respondent No.1 is directed to conclude the entire proceedings within six(6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that, both parties are directed to maintain status-quo in respect of the revenue entries, till the conclusion of the proceedings before respondent No.1. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61