- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010561412025 NC: 2026:KHC:40602 RP No. 358 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.358 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAYARAM S/O SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT SADAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DEVENAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. RESIDING AT MYLANHALLI VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BANGALORE NORTH -562123. 2. SRI. GOPALAIAH S/O LATE ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT MYLANHALLI VILLAGE Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010561412025 NC: 2026:KHC:40602 RP No. 358 of 2025 JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BANGALORE NORTH -562123. 3. SMT. A MANJULA D/O LATE ANJINAPPA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. R/AT VIJAYAPURA, RAMAMANDIRA BEDI VIJAYAPURA TOWN, DEVANHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562135. 4. SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIKRISHNA D/O LATE ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT VIJAYAPURA, RAMAMANDIRA BEDI VIJAYAPURA TOWN, DEVANHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562135. 5. SRI. SANDEEP S/O JAYARAM AND LATE SHANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS RESIDING AT SADAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, DEVENAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010561412025 NC: 2026:KHC:40602 RP No. 358 of 2025 THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 30.08.2024 PASSED IN RSA NO.1516/2022 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY, BY ALLOWING THIS REVIEW PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard Sri K. Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, and Sri T. Sheshagiri Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. 2. In this petition, the petitioner has sought for reviewing the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in RSA No. 1516 of 2022. 3. After arguing the matter for some time, Sri K. Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the Review Petitioner, submitted that the review petitioner is claiming rights - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010561412025 NC: 2026:KHC:40602 RP No. 358 of 2025 over the property in question through his wife, late Smt. Shanthamma. In this regard, he placed reliance upon the proceedings in FDP No. 4 of 2007 pending before the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) and JMFC, Devanahalli. 4. Per contra, Sri T. Sheshagiri Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5, submitted that the claim made by the review petitioner is only in respect of such portion of the schedule property as may fall to the share of late Smt. Shanthamma. Therefore, according to him, the claim of the review petitioner is required to be considered under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Accordingly, he sought dismissal of the review petition. 5. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, and upon careful consideration of the material on record, I am of - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010561412025 NC: 2026:KHC:40602 RP No. 358 of 2025 the opinion that the review petitioner was deleted from the array of parties by order dated 30.08.2024 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2024 in RSA No.1516 of 2022. It is the specific case of the review petitioner that he is claiming rights over the property as the husband of late Smt. Shanthamma. 6. In the above circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that no interference is called for with the compromise decree entered into between the parties on 30.08.2024 in R.A. No. 1516 of 2022. However, it is open to the review petitioner to work out his remedy before the competent Court, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Review Petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1