Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34047 (CHH)

RAJESH DEEWAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPPIL/2/2025 · 2026-09-01

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010456252024 2026:CGHC:38793-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPPIL No. 2 of 2025 1 - Rajesh Deewan S/o Sampuran Das Deewan Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Kukdur, Tahsil - Kukdur, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Kabridham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil - Kukdur, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department Division Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6 - Rakesh Sahu Contractor (Regd. No. Cger 22364) Village Mainpura, Tahsil - Pandariya, (Now Kukdur), District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For petitioner : Shri Sourabh Agrawal, Advocate. For State : Shri Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 02.09.2026 Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 1 The present Public Interest Litigation has been filed seeking following reliefs : “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records concerning the present construction. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to allow this petition and further be please to direct to the respondent authorities to construct the Tahsil Office Building at Village INDRAJEET SAHU Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2026.09.02 17:09:50 +0530 2 Kukdur, District Kabirdham (C.G.) as early as possible, is in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present PIL has now become infructuous as the relief sought in the present PIL has already been redressed and Tehsil building is constructed at village Kukdur, Tehsil Kukdur, District Kabirdham. 3 In view of the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, the present PIL is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice inder