Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34042 (CAL)

SUBHASH DAS AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2474/2026 · 2026-08-19

Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.08.2026 DL-42 Court No.551 [Bench ID-266058] (AD) (Rejected) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 2474 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Dhubulia Police Station Case No.181 of 2026 dated 19.04.2026 under Sections 310(2)/311 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, S.L. No.1864 of 2026 now pending before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadia at Krishnanagar. And In the matter of: Subhash Das & Anr. ….petitioners Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr. Suvom Dutta, Advocate Mr. Poonnug Roy, Advocate …for the petitioners Mr. Pradip Banerjee, Ld. APP Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi, Advocate … for the State Mr. Prabir Majumder, Advocate Mr. Snehansu Majumder, Advocate Ms. Sangeeta Chakraborty, Advocate Ms. A. Kundu, Advocate … for the de facto complainant 1. There is allegation of looting away Rs. 85 lakhs. The petitioners have been named in the statements recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS as the assailants. The injury report shows lacerated cut injuries over scalp. 2. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence and the materials contained in the case diary and also taking into account the amount of Rs.52 lakhs was recovered, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. 2 4. C.R.M. (A) 2474 of 2026 is dismissed. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.08.20 18:29:18 +05'30'