CWP-18009-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-18009-2026 Date of decision : 27.07.2026 Geeta Gupta ... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr.Kartik Gupta, Advocate and Mr.Hitesh Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A. G. Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of mandamus praying that directions be issued to the respondents to issue re-allotment letter in respect of residential plot no.127, Sector 30, Gurugram in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing CWP-4469-2022 which was disposed of vide order dated 08.03.2022 in the following terms:- “Mr. Chauhan submits that in case the petitioner were to apply under the policy issued vide memo dated 05.03.2019 on the subject – DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.28 15:45 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-18009-2026 2 policy with regard to the transfer of plot on the basis of registered sale deed-amendment thereof, due procedure would be followed and such application for issuance of a re-allotment letter would be dealt with in accordance with law as also the terms and conditions contained in the memo dated 05.03.2019 itself. Statement made by learned counsel representing respondent- HSVP is accepted. No further directions are required to be passed at this stage. Writ petition is disposed of. Suffice it to observe that it would now be open for the petitioner to apply for issuance of a re-allotment letter for the plot in question as per procedure envisaged in memo dated 05.03.2019 issued by HSVP.” 3. It is submitted that in pursuance of the same, the petitioner had applied for re-allotment of the house in question as per policy dated 05.03.2019 (Annexure P-15). It is further submitted that with respect to the said application, due publication has already been done and no objection has been received from any person and further even the necessary affidavit and indemnity bond has been given by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent no.3 is directed to decide the application dated 09.03.2022 in a time bound manner and in case everything is in order, then, to grant necessary relief in accordance with law. 4. Learned State counsel has submitted that respondent no.3 would take final decision on the application dated 09.03.2022 within a period of one month from today. 5. Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to take DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.28 15:45 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-18009-2026 3 final decision on the application dated 09.03.2022 within a period of one month from today and in case the application is meritorious, then, to grant necessary relief to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the merits of the application and respondent no.3 would decide the same independently in accordance with law. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 27, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.28 15:45 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment