Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3404 (ALL)

HAJI ABDUL RASHEED ANSARI AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/18595/2026 · 2026-05-05

Nand Prabha Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18595 of 2026 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sandip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed to allow this application and to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 75458 of 2023 (State Vs. Abdul Rasheed & Others) including charge- sheet dated 26.03.2023 and Cognizance order dated 17.05.2023, arising out Case Crime No.44 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Bhelupur, District-Varanasi, on the basis of compromise dated 23.01.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their disputes through compromise dated 23.01.2026 which has been placed as Annexure No. "4" to the application. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings before the Court concerned and the same is not only sheer wastage of time of the Court but also abuse of process of law. 4. Learned A.G.A., however, submits that it is the Trial Court, which has to verify the fact as to whether the parties have entered into compromise, hence the applicants may approach the concerned Court and move an application with respect to compromise between the parties, which will be decided in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Haji Abdul Rasheed Ansari And 8 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both the parties are directed to appear in person before the Trial Court along with compromise deed as well certified copy of this order within three weeks from today. It is expected that Court concerned may fix a date for the verification of the compromise and after ensuring the presence of the parties, pass an appropriate order with respect to the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the Court concerned shall also record the statements of the parties as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not. 6. The Court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. Till verification of compromise between the parties by the Court concerned, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 8. With the aforesaid directions, this application is disposed of. May 6, 2026 Puspendra NA528 No. 18595 of 2026 2 (Nand Prabha Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- PUSPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad