Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34039 (PAT)

Binod Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./8889/2026 · 2026-02-16

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8889 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-661 Year-2025 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Binod Yadav S/o Lakhan Yadav Resident of Village- Alambigha, P.S.- Aatari, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 16-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 85 litres of liquor along with 1000 litres of fermented jawa mahua solution from a bush near the bank of a river. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated based on the disclosure made Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8889 of 2026(2) dt.16-02-2026 2/2 by the local person but then the name of the person who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR, which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2026. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No.661/2025. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T