Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3401 (RAJ)

MAHESH S/O TARACHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6029/2026 · 2026-04-30

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:18410] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6029/2026 Mahesh S/o Tarachand, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Peeli Kothi, Bhawanimandi, Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bhawani Mandi). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Kumar Jha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.129/2026 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar for offences under Section 111(3) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 8 and 30 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is for preparation of commission of offence punishable under the NDPS Act. It is submitted that no contraband has been recovered from the petitioner, except for a mobile phone. The petitioner has been in custody since 03.04.2026 with two criminal antecedents of [2026:RJ-JP:18410] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6029/2026] different nature. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mahesh S/o Tarachand, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/99