Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3401 (ORI)

AMULYA CHARAN MAHAKUD v. ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, NEW DELHI

WP(C)/1203/2026 · 2026-04-09

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 1203 of 2026 Amulya Charan Mahakud ..... Petitioner Mr. N. Biswal, Advocate -versus- Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. U. Mishra, Advocate CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 09.04.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. N. Biswal, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. U. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Pursuant to order dtd.13.03.2026, learned counsel appearing for the EPFO produced the order showing sanction of the pension in favour of the Petitioner under the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995. The same be kept in record. Copy of the order is also provided to the learned counsel for the Petitioner in Court. 4. Since Petitioner has got the benefit, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. 5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha