AMULYA CHARAN MAHAKUD v. ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, NEW DELHI
WP(C)/1203/2026 · 2026-04-09
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3401 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3401 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 1203 of 2026
Amulya Charan Mahakud ..... Petitioner Mr. N. Biswal, Advocate -versus- Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. U. Mishra, Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 09.04.2026
Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. N. Biswal, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. U. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Pursuant to order dtd.13.03.2026, learned counsel appearing for the EPFO produced the order showing sanction of the pension in favour of the Petitioner under the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995. The same be kept in record. Copy of the order is also provided to the
learned counsel for the Petitioner in Court.
4. Since Petitioner has got the benefit, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.
5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha