Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3401 (CHH)

SMT. NEETILIKA SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/186/2026 · 2026-01-20

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3480 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 186 of 2026 1 - Smt. Neetilika Sharma W/o N.P. Sharma Aged About 45 Years (Earlier Known As Neetilika Tiwari, As Recorded In Joining Letter), Presently Working As Teacher (Lb), At Government Middle School, Tifra, District Bilaspur (C.G.) R/o- Abhishek Viahar Phase-2, Near Maharshi School Mangla, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Education, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director School Education Department, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer Block Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shrikant Kaushik, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Deeksha Gauraha, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 21 /01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- 2 “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent number 2 to decide the petitioner’s pending representation dated 31.12.2025 (Annexure P/6) within stipulated time frame, by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief’s in favour of the petitioner, which this Hon’ble Court deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner. ” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file better constituted petition. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.22 14:54:53 +0530