IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9438 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2020 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vijay Paswan @ Karn Son of Late Bahadur Paswan Resident of Village- Aura, PS- Tariyani, District- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 16-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Meenapur P.S. Case No. 237 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 399, 386, 411, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1- B)a/26/ 35 of the Arms Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 13.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12464 of 2025 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 237 if 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 399, 386, 411, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner was caught while the naxals were preparing to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9438 of 2026(2) dt.16-02-2026 2/2 commit a crime. 4. The petitioner is accused in 3 more cases of similar and serious nature and in custody since 5.5.2023. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a naxal and also considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that till now charges have not been framed. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court finds no ground to review its earlier order. 5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again with direction to the concerned court below to expedite the trial and frame the charges at the earliest. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated through FAX or e-mail to the Principal District Judge, East Champaran for its compliance. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T