Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34005 (PNJ)

JITENDER KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/22900/2026 · 2026-07-27

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CWP-22900-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-22900-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 Jitender Kumar ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG Haryana-State. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 26.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) submitted by petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order after duly considering the claim of petitioner in accordance with law and after examining the availability of vacancies and the status of appointments, if any, made against advertisement No.12/2019 PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.07.28 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP-22900-2026 for the post of Electrician Instructor (Theory), Category No.23 within a stipulated period along with all consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present writ petition at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 27.07.2026 Puneet Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.07.28 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document