Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 340 (RAJ)

SAJID KHAN S/O HASAN MOHD. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/5172/2026 · 2026-03-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11732] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5172/2026 1. Sajid Khan S/o Hasan Mohd., Aged About 48 Years, R/o Near Jama Masjid, Rewasan (168), Tehsil Nuh, Mewat, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 74 B 6876 2. Ram Geeta Minechem Llp, T/a Kakrala, Tehsil Pahari, Dis- trict Bharatpur, Through Proprietor Chhitar Mal Agarwal S/o Ramavatar Agarwal, R/o Rani Sati Mandir Ke Pas, Ward No. 14, Village Ganeswar, Tehsil Neemkathana, Dis- trict Sikar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Regis- tration No. Rj 05 Gb 6478, Rj 05 Gb 6480 3. Fazal Contractor Co., Gadpur Jhiwana, Tehsil Tijara, Dis- trict Alwar Through Proprietor Farman Khan S/o Sammi Khan, R/o Gadpur, Jhiwana, District Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Gb 0071 4. Mehboob Khan S/o Hanif Khan, R/o Wahad Ka Bas Neemli, Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Ga 6788 5. Majid S/o Saraju Deen, R/o Neemli, Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Ga 5031 6. A K Jilshan Cont., Village Neemli, Main Road, Tijara, Al- war, Through Proprietor Akram Khan S/o Jakir Hussain, R/o Neemli, Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehi- cle Registration No. Rj 40 Ga 6751 7. Liyakat Ali S/o Dilavar, R/o Kholi Bas, Neemli, Alwar, Ra- jasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Ga 6527 8. M/s Liyakat Building Material, Village Neemli, Tehsil Ti- jara, Alwar, Rajasthan, Through Proprietor Liyakat Ali S/o Dilavar, R/o Kholi Bas, Neemli, Alwar, Rajasthan, Regis- tered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Ga 6526, Rj 40 Ga 4684 And Rj 40 Ga 5710 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. [2026:RJ-JP:11732] (2 of 4) [CW-5172/2026] 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Bikaner, District Bikaner (Rajasthan). 5. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). 6. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Sujangarh, District Churu (Rajasthan). 7. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Didwana, District Did- wana-Kuchaman (Rajasthan). 8. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kot- putl-Behror (Rajasthan). 9. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). 10. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 11. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). 12. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 13. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajani Vyas For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/03/2026 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition, has already been [2026:RJ-JP:11732] (3 of 4) [CW-5172/2026] decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State agrees and submits that the present writ petition may also be de- cided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra). 3. Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), are as follows :- “6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without go- ing into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the im- pugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petition- ers are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their fami- lies. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the pe- titioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days. 7. Audience with respect to the same will be pro- vided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adju- dication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 8. It is made clear that during the period of consid- eration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential pro- ceedings as registered and entered upon the official [2026:RJ-JP:11732] (4 of 4) [CW-5172/2026] portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado. 9. It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order. 10. In the light of the same, the present writ peti- tion stands disposed of with the aforementioned di- rections being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.” 4. Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:- (i)The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners were suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to/before the Notice Issuing Authority on 30.03.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and shall submit their explanation. (ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 5. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /16