Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33991 (KAR)

SRI DEVARAJEGOWDA, v. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS,

WP/23328/2026 · 2026-07-31

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010512092026 NC: 2026:KHC:40360 WP No. 23328 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.23328 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI DEVARAJEGOWDA, S/O. LATE THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, NO. 377, VIDYANAGAR CROSS, B.E.L. ROAD, BETTA AALASURU, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -562157. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR D.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BENGALURU DIVISION, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANT OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, AND EX-OFFICIO DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562101. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010512092026 NC: 2026:KHC:40360 WP No. 23328 of 2026 3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562101. 4. TALUK SURVEYOR, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, SIDLAGHATTA - 562105. 5. THE THASILDAR, SIDLAGHTTA TALUK, SIDLAGHATTA - 562105. 6. SMT. NAGARATNAMMA, W/O. LATE B.R. AMARAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT. BA. SHEETIHALLI VILLAGE, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK - 562105. 7. SRI NAGALAH, S/O. VENKATASHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 8. SRI. KRISHNAMURHTY, S/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 9. SRI. DILIP, S/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 10. SMT. MANJULAMMA, W/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010512092026 NC: 2026:KHC:40360 WP No. 23328 of 2026 11. SMT. PRAMILA D/O. VENKATARAMANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 12. SMT. SARASWATHI, D/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 13. SMT. JANAKI, D/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 14. SRI. DYAVAPPA, S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 15. SMT. MUNIYAMMA, W/O. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 16. SMT. RAMAKKA, W/O. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 17. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O. RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 18. SRI. N. NAGESH, S/O. LATE NARASIMHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010512092026 NC: 2026:KHC:40360 WP No. 23328 of 2026 19. SRI B.R. AMARAN, S/O. LATE RAMANARAYANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 20. SMT. VENKATAMMA, W/O. CHIKKAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 21. SRI. VENKATARAMANPPA, S/O. VENKATASHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 22. SRI. MANJUNATH, S/O. PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 23. SRI. DODDAVENKATARAYAPPA, S/O. ADIMURHTY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 24. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, S/O. SITHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 25. SRI. CHOWDAPPA, S/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 26. SMT. PADMAMMA, W/O. VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010512092026 NC: 2026:KHC:40360 WP No. 23328 of 2026 27. SRI. CHHIKKANARAYANAPPA, S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 28. SRI. PEERSABI, S/O. HUSAIN SABI, AGED ABOUT MAJOR. 29. SRI. SHIVAPPA, S/O. GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT MAJOR. 30. SRI GANGAPPA, S/O. VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT MAJOR. RESPONDENTS NO.6 TO 29 ARE R/AT BA. SHEETYHALLI VILLAGE, BA.SHEETYHALLI HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562105. 31. SRI RAMA TEMPLE, KACHANAIKANAHALLI, BA. SHEETYHALLI HOBLI, SIDLAGATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562105. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010512092026 NC: 2026:KHC:40360 WP No. 23328 of 2026 QUASH THE ANNEXURE - A, BEARING NO. PRA.BHOO.JAM.NI. REVISION (CHI. BHA) 34/2023/24 DATED 28-11-2024 PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order in case No.PRA.BHOO.JAM.NI.REVISION(CHI.BHA)34/2023/24 dated 28.11.2024 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.1, inter alia, sought for a direction to respondent No.1 to conduct phodi and durust in respect of the land in question. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the reasons assigned by respondent No.1 at Annexure-A would indicate that the petitioner is seeking fixing the boundaries based on the phodi made during 1983. In that view of the matter, taking into - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010512092026 NC: 2026:KHC:40360 WP No. 23328 of 2026 consideration that re-phodi cannot be done after 42 years of the original phodi made during 1983, the reasons assigned by the respondent-authority are just and proper which do not call for interference in this Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34