1 CGHC010205772021 2026:CGHC:37698 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3327 of 2021 1 - Durgesh Kumar S/o Ramnarayan Kesharvani Aged About 62 Years Old R/o Nagoi, Belghana, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary , Ministry Of Home Affairs Government Of India North Block , New Delhi 110001. 2 - Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Finance Government Of India, North Block , New Delhi 110001. 3 - The Governor Reserve Bank Of India , Central Office Building , 18th Floor, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai Maharashtra 400001 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Finance , Through The Secretary , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya , Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The District Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 – AU Small Finance Bajpais Pavillion , Bharti Nagar Chowk Vyapar Vihar Road, Talapara , Gayatri Nagar , Opposite Gumber Petrol, Bilaspur , Chhattisgarh 495001 Through Its Branch Manager. 7 - AU Small Finance Bank Ltd (Formerly Known As Au Financiers (India) Limited 19 A, Dhuleshwar. Garden Ajmer Raod, Jaipur Rajasthan 302001 Through Its Board Of Directors RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.08.31 16:21:24 +0530 2 8 - Asha Sankhala Sole Arbitrator R/o, 12- K/ 06, Jyoti Nagar, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur 302015. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI For State/Respondents No .4 & 5 : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No. 6 & 7 : Mr. Faiz Kazi, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Saleem Kazi, Advocate For Respondents No. 8 : Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 21/08/2026 1. No one appears, nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitioner, even when the case is called for hearing in the second round. The writ petition is of the year 2021. 2. In view of above circumstance, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi