Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33979 (PNJ)

SAMTA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8937/2026 · 2026-07-28

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRM-M-8937-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRWP-8937-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.07.2026 SAMTA AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ankit Kharbanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and to restrain respondents No.4 and 5 from harassing or interfering in the peaceful life of the petitioners. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits after arguing for some time that petitioner submitted a representation dated 22.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, District Amritsar, and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, District Amritsar to consider and decide representation dated 22.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CRM-M-8937-2026 (O&M) 4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course. 5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, District Amritsar to decide the aforesaid representation dated 22.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 28.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document