Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33978 (KAR)

SRI SIDHARTH PANDURANGAN @ SIDHARTH T v. MR. BHARATIRAJ R

MFA/5835/2023 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T. AND SRI NAMAN VANKDARI M., MEMBER MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5835 OF 2023 (MV-I) (LOK-ADALAT NO 2241 OF 2026) BETWEEN: SRI. SIDHARTH PANDURANGAN @ SIDHARTH T S/O. PANDURANGAN HARIKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.12 ATHITHI LAYOUT CLUB ROAD ANANADAPURA CIRCLE T.C. PALYA MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-79 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI KAILAS SHANKAR P S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. BHARATIRAJ R S/O. RAJASHEKAR R MAJOR R/AT NO.32 2ND CROSS ABHIRUDDI LAYOUT NEAR LVS APARTMENT T.C. PALYA BANGALORE - 560036 2. THE MANAGER THE BHARTI AXA GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD SY.126 1ST FLOOR FIRNS ICON BUILDING NEXT AKME BALLET DODDANEKUNDI BANGALORE - 560037 NOW DEMERGED WITH THE ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INS. CO. 9TH FLOOR THE ESTATE 121 Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 DICKENSON ROAD M.G. ROAD BANGALORE - 560042 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI UDAYA SHANKAR RAI P., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI ANUP SEETHARAM RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED.30.12.2022 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.5848 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. JUDGE & ACMM COURT SMALL CAUSES, MACT BANGALORE ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its Authorised Officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.8,50,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Fifty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within a period of six 3 weeks' from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. 5. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed off in terms of the joint memo. The judgment and award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER mn/-