19.08.2026 Serial no. 618 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (A) 2622 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Kaliachak PS Case No. 605 of 2026 dated 07.05.2026 u/s 329(3)/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Timir Mandal & Ors. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Amarta Ghose Ms. Swagata Das … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case over the issue relating to previous grudge. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces the case diary. Reference has been made in the injury report as well as the statement of the injured. The statement of the injured refers to specific overt acts by the present petitioners. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. 2 Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2622 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)