Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33972 (MAD)

Ranjan Barma v. THE ZONAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR

WP/21337/2026 · 2026-06-11

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21337 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 21337 of 2026 Ranjan Barma S/o.Jagan Mohanlal Barma Mandevilla Gardens Ballygunge Kolkata. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Sholinganallur Taluk Chennai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioners Application No.2022/0103/02/197379 dated 29.06.2022 sent for cancellation of existing patta and issuance of separate patta in petitioners name in respect of petitioners lands measuriing 1 Ground in Plot No. 249 situated in Survey No. 3/289 Uthandi Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chengalpattu District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K. Govi Ganesan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Guruprasad, Govt’s counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 29.06.2022. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21337 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 29.06.2022 before the respondents, requesting for cancellation of existing patta and issuance of separate patta in favour of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the espondent till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 12 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 29.06.2022 and dispose of the same, on merits and in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21337 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Sholinganallur Taluk Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21337 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 21337 of 2026 11-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis