06.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.302. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (A) 2169 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk Police Station case no. 126 of 2026 dated 22.02.2026 under Sections 85/103(I)/80(I)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. And In the matter of : Sankar Chakraborty & Ors. ……Petitioners. Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Bhaskar Hutait .....for the Petitioners. Mr. Paramand Sharma, Ld. APP Mr. A. Bhusan Bagchi ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is the mother-in- law and petitioner no.3 is the brother-in-law of the deceased. It has also been informed that the husband of the deceased was arrested and subsequently released on bail. It has also been pointed out that charge-sheet has been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and draws the attention of the Court to the post-mortem report, suicidal note and other statement which have been recorded by the investigating agency. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the Case Dairy and I am of the opinion that as charge-sheet has been submitted and suicidal note do not referred to the present petitioners, I am inclined to allow the prayer for anticipatory bail of 2 the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners namely, Sankar Chakraborty, Tapati Chakraborty and Indranil Chakraborty is allowed. As such, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 2169 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)