Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33963 (PNJ)

RAKESH ALIAS SONU v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/543/2026 · 2026-07-23

Anoop Chitkara, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

279 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-543-2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Rakesh @ Sonu ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, D.A.G., Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. 1. Seeking emergency parole for 28 days, the petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 3 and 5(1) of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act. 2. Case called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. State counsel submits that parole was sought to take care of the minor son who has suffered fracture in January 2026 and his mother is there to take care of him and there is no reason to grant him parole. 4. Given above, the present petition is dismissed. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE 23.07.2026 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. 1 JYOTI SHARMA 2026.07.28 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh