ZAHIR ULLAH NAIK v. STATE TH.REVENUE DEPTT.AND ORS.
OWP/153/2017 · 2026-09-29
Shahzad Azeem
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3396 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3396 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 153/2017
Zahir Ullah Naik
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
State and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Mehar Bali, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG Ms. Malvika Gupta, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER 29.09.2026
1. From the last two consecutive dates of hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was called, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecution of the petition.
3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution.
(Shahzad Azeem)
Judge
Jammu 29.09.2026 Tarun /PS
Serial No. 49 Tarun Kumar Gupta 2026.09.30 16.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document