SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SHRI MAHESH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4643/2026 · 2026-04-30
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3394 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3394 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:18347] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4643/2026 Sushil Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 3 Chaudhary Colony, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj) ( The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In The Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma with Ms. Chanchal and Mr. Uttam Prakash Saini for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 30/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.63/2026 registered at Police Station Patrakar Colony, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 8 and 22 NDPS Act, 1985.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the recovery of 7 grams of MDMA from his conscious possession, which is below the commercial quantity. The petitioner has been in custody since 12.03.2026 and has no criminal antecedent. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful
[2026:RJ-JP:18347] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4643/2026] purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sushil Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Mahesh Kumar Sharma, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/57