Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3394 (AP)

IFFCO-TOKIO GEN. INS. COM. LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM v. P NAGABHUSHANA RAO, VIZIANAGARAM DIST & 2 OTHERS

CRP/2545/2017 · 2026-06-21

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation:________________ Date of reserved for orders : Date of Pronouncement :22.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010532182017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2545/2017 Between: 1. IFFCO-TOKIO GEN. INS. COM. LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER. VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. P NAGABHUSHANA RAO VIZIANAGARAM DIST 2 OTHERS, S/O. LATE BALARAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT R.VENKAMPETA VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. N RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O. APPALANAIUD. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, DRIVER OF LORRY BEARING NO. AP 20T 8566 RESIDING AT D.NO. 2-129, S.R. PURAM COLONY, JUTHADA POST, PENDURTHY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. G ARJUNARAO, S/O. APPARAO. AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OWNER OF LORRY BEARING NO. AP 20T 8566. RESIDING AT GOVADA VILLAGE, CHODAVARAM POST AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto call far the records and allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the impugned order and the decree dated 22-2-2017 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum-II Addl. District Judge, Parvatipuram in MVOP No.642 of 2012 pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 3339 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuane of the order and the decree dated 22-2-2017 passed in MVOP.No. 642 of 2012 on the file of the MACT- cum-II Addl. District Judge, Parvatipuram pending disposal of the above CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TALLURI VEERABHADRA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2545 /2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking to set aside the impugned order and the decree dated 22.02.2017 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum-II Addl. District Judge, Parvatipuram in MVOP.No.642 of 2012. 2. None appeared for the petitioner on 18.06.2026. Hence, this Court posted the matter to 22.06.2026 under the caption ‘For dismissal’. Even today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter. 3. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 4 50 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:2545/2017 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP