1 CGHC010293032024 2026:CGHC:38431 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4326 of 2024 Rajdhani Travels Through Its Proprietor, Smt. Dhara Devi Singh, Aged About 72 Years, W/o Late Samarjeet Singh, R/o Baiswara House, Shyam Nagar Polsay Para Durg Distt. Durg, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, Transport Section, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi- 110001 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Transport Department, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G. 3 - Transport Commissioner State Transport Department, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, C.G. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Lal Dembra, Advocate For Union of India : Ms. Anmol Sharma, CGC For State : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Deputy Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 31.08.2026 1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, in view of the notification issued by the State Government dated 28.04.2025 and the subsequent developments, the grievance raised by the petitioner no longer survives for consideration. It is submitted that the relief sought YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.08.31 17:26:02 +0530 2 by the petitioner has already been extended pursuant to the aforesaid notification and, therefore, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concurs with the aforesaid submission and submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition. 3 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4 In view of the subsequent notification dated 28.04.2025 and the fact that the grievance of the petitioner already stands redressed, no effective relief remains to be granted in the present proceedings. Consequently, continuation of the writ petition would serve no useful purpose. 5 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh