1 CGHC010379342024 2026:CGHC:38432 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5559 of 2024 Ashwani Bhaskar S/o Shri Sahukar Bhaskar Aged About 40 Years Occupation Elected Panch Of Ward No. 14 At Gram Panchayat Bharari, R/o Village Bharari, P.S. And Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Additional Collector/collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) / Competent Authority Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Additional Tahsildar Tahsil Ganiyari, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Santoshi Bai Vastrakar W/o Shri Ramnaresh Vastrakar Sarpanch At Gram Panchayat Bharari, R/o Village Bharari, P.S. And Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 31.08.2026 1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the grievance raised by the petitioner has already been redressed by the concerned authorities and, therefore, no surviving cause of action now remains for adjudication by this Court. It is further submitted that in view of the YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.08.31 17:26:03 +0530 2 subsequent developments and the relief having already been extended to the petitioner, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the State fairly concurs with the aforesaid submission advanced on behalf of the petitioner and submits that nothing further survives for consideration in the present matter. 3 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions so made, this Court is of the opinion that since the grievance of the petitioner already stands redressed and no substantive issue survives for adjudication, continuation of the present proceedings would serve no useful purpose. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh