HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17767 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the approval order dated 21.06.2023, approving the grant of fisheries lease to the respondents. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that under Rule 59 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, an appeal is provided before the District Magistrate, against the order impugned. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Nath Tripathi, Prashant Mani Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Brijesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad