Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33919 (MAD)

MUNIYAPILLLAI (Deaf and Dumb) v. The District Collector

WP/22641/2026 · 2026-06-15

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 22641 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 22641 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 24558 OF 2026 MUNIYAPILLLAI (Deaf and Dumb) S/o.Arumugam, Represent by his son, Ganesh, M/A.21 Years, S/o.Muniyapillai, new colony (west street), Arur village and post, sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District - 606402. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi. 3. The Tahsildar sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District. 4. Tamilarasi W/o.Subramani, south street, new colony, Arur Village and post, sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to pass final order on the application of cancellation of patta based on the report sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent dated 19.01.2026 in Na.Ka.No.A4/61/2026 and to issue in favour of the petitioner in Old Survey No.7/13A, New Survey https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22641 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 No.7/42, measuring an extent of 3 cents, situated at Arur village and post, sankarapuram taluk, kallakurichi District within a stipulated time. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Vignesh For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt's Cl. for R1 to R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.10.2025. 2. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 06.10.2025 before the official respondents, requesting them for cancellation of patta. However, no final order was passed in the said representation till date. Hence, this petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22641 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2025 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 15-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22641 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The District Collector Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi. 3. The Tahsildar sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22641 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 22641 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 24558 OF 2026 15-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis